Converse v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.
The conviction is for burglary; the penalty assessed is confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The judgment of conviction was affirmed at a former day of this term. In his motion for rehearing appellant urgently insists that we reached a wrong conclusion in our original opinion.
Articles 1389 and 1390 of the Penal Code define ordinary burglary. Article 1391, P. C., defines burglary of a private residence at night, defines a private residence, fixes the punishment, and then as a part of said article, provides: “Such burglary (that is, of a private residence at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jarrott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Martinus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Osborne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Palafox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Converse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.