Legal Opinion
Daniel v. Unumprovident Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 24, 2008No. 06-3774-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is VACATED AND REMANDED for further proceedings.
Deborah Daniel appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Feuerstein, J.) granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing her complaint. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, proceedings below, and specification of issues for review.
Defendant UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (“UNUM Life”) issued a group long term disability insurance…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Martha Kinstler v. First Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Anna Fay and Louis Fay v. Oxford Health Plan, Mount Sinai Medical Center Point-Of-Service-PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Meidl v. Aetna, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Boelter v. Hearst Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Gaud-Figueroa v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Khan v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Munich Reinsurance America, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.