Legal Opinion

Mautner-Glick Corp. v. Acosta

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 24, 2018No. 2018 NYSlipOp 51346(U)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mautner-Glick Corporation and Carmine Limited, 570336/18 Petitioners-Landlords-Appellants,

against

Louis Acosta, Respondent-Tenant-Respondent, -and- "John Doe and/or Jane Doe," Respondents-Undertenants-Respondents.

Landlords appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Anne Katz, J.), dated January 24, 2018, which granted tenant's motion to vacate a stipulation of settlement and consent judgment of possession and restored the case to the calendar, and denied landlords' cross motion to direct tenant to post an undertaking in a nonpayment summary proceeding.

2Per curiam

Appe…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FrutigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Khatibi v. WeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. BML Realty Group v. SamuelsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API