Legal Opinion

State v. Mendibles

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 24, 1975No. 2 CA-CR 690PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Appellant, convicted of robbery and aggravated assault, seeks reversal of both convictions. 1

Appellant claims the trial court erred in sentencing him under A.R.S. Sec. 13-1649, the enhanced punishment statute, “because the trial court did not allow the filing of an allegation of a prior conviction.” Appellant, however, ignores the fact that a true bill on the prior conviction was returned by the grand jury and the allegation of a prior conviction was appended to the indictment. A.R.S; Sec. 13-1649(B) provides:

“The punishments prescribed by this section shall be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Browning v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. State v. SpillmanArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. McInellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-123196Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. State v. MendiblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API