State v. Mendibles
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Appellant, convicted of robbery and aggravated assault, seeks reversal of both convictions. 1
Appellant claims the trial court erred in sentencing him under A.R.S. Sec. 13-1649, the enhanced punishment statute, “because the trial court did not allow the filing of an allegation of a prior conviction.” Appellant, however, ignores the fact that a true bill on the prior conviction was returned by the grand jury and the allegation of a prior conviction was appended to the indictment. A.R.S; Sec. 13-1649(B) provides:
“The punishments prescribed by this section shall be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Browning v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- State v. SpillmanArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. McInellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-123196Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- State v. MendiblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.