Legal Opinion

Zimmerle v. Felzien

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1926No. 26,471PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for $119.25 as an alleged balance due for wages in building a house.

The action was commenced before a justice of the peace. The issues were framed in bills of particulars filed by the litigants.

Plaintiff alleged that in the summer of 1922 he and defendant made an oral agreement whereby he undertook to do all the carpenter work on a house being constructed on defendant’s farm for $850—

“And pursuant to said verbal contract plaintiff employed workmen, and also used his own labor, and started on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lobenstein v. McGrawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Ziegler v. OsbornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. Fritts v. QuintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Baughman v. HaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peters v. HalliganNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Reddington v. RankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. Sharman v. Webber Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Peters v. HalliganNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API