Legal Opinion

Doe v. Durtschi

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1986No. 15223, 15224, 15225, 15277, 15278 and 15279Published

1Opinion of the Court

716 P.2d 1238 (1986)

110 Idaho 466

John DOE and Jane Doe, for themselves and as natural guardians of Jenny Doe, Rachael Roe and Richard Roe, for themselves and as natural guardians of Ruby Roe, a minor, Jane Smith, for herself and as natural guardian of Sally Smith, a minor, Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Respondents,

v.

Lawrence R. DURTSCHI, Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Respondent, and

Joint School District No. 93, Bonneville and Bingham Counties, Idaho, Defendant/Respondent/Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 15223, 15224, 15225, 15277, 15278 and 15279.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

February 10, 1986.

Rehearing Denied April…

Also in this document: Dissent · Shepard; Dissent · Bakes; Concurrence.

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Kosak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API