Legal Opinion

In re Coca-Cola Products Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided August 7, 2014No. MDL No. 2555Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1387TRANSFER ORDER

MARJORIE O. RENDELL, Acting Chairman.

Before the Panel:* The Coca-Cola defendants 1 seek centralization of this litigation, which concerns the alleged deceptive labeling of the Coca-Cola soft drink, in the Northern District of California. This litigation currently consists of six actions pending in the Northern District of California, the Northern District of Illinois and the Eastern District of New York, as listed" on Schedule A.

Responding plaintiffs oppose centralization. Plaintiffs in two Northern District of California actions (Engumsoff and Aumil-ler) and the Eastern…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Nutella Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  2. In re Kashi Co. Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  3. In re Skinnygirl Margarita Beverage Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  4. In re Frito-Lay North America, Inc. "All Natural" LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  5. In re Tropicana Orange Juice Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API