Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bostick v. DeSoto County Ex Rel. Board of Supervisors

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided May 9, 2017No. 2015-CA-01500-COAPublished

1DissentBarnes, J.

¶ 21. I respectfully dissent. The DeSoto County zoning regulations do not prohibit the rental of properties in the A-R zone. The County’s classification of the use of Bostick’s and Poe’s properties as a “hotel” is manifestly unreasonable, and the chancery court’s injunction prohibiting “vacation rentals” is without foundation in the regulations.

¶22. The pertinent permitted use for this A-R zone is a “single family dwelling.” Neither the County nor the chancery court relies on the definition of “family” in limiting the use of the properties; the chancery court’s injunction does not allow…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houston v. Wilson Mesa Ranch Homeowners Association, IncColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Brown v. Sandy City Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  3. I. Shvekh v. The ZHB of Stroud Twp. and Twp. of StroudCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Atkinson v. WiltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Heef Realty & Investments, LLP v. City of Cedarburg Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API