Bostick v. DeSoto County Ex Rel. Board of Supervisors
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1DissentBarnes, J.
¶ 21. I respectfully dissent. The DeSoto County zoning regulations do not prohibit the rental of properties in the A-R zone. The County’s classification of the use of Bostick’s and Poe’s properties as a “hotel” is manifestly unreasonable, and the chancery court’s injunction prohibiting “vacation rentals” is without foundation in the regulations.
¶22. The pertinent permitted use for this A-R zone is a “single family dwelling.” Neither the County nor the chancery court relies on the definition of “family” in limiting the use of the properties; the chancery court’s injunction does not allow…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Houston v. Wilson Mesa Ranch Homeowners Association, IncColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Brown v. Sandy City Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- I. Shvekh v. The ZHB of Stroud Twp. and Twp. of StroudCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Atkinson v. WiltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Heef Realty & Investments, LLP v. City of Cedarburg Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015