Boyd v. Huffaker
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. The facts are stated in Boyd v. Hvffalcer, 39 Kas. 525, and in the opinion herein, filed at the session of the court in February, 1889.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The facts of this case as they appear from the pleadings are substantially as follows: Just prior to July 20,1883, Jesse Boyd drove a herd of cattle into Barber county, Kansas, and on that day C. T. Rigg, the sheriff of that county, against the will of Boyd, took the cattle into his possession and claimed to hold them under chapter 161 of the Laws of 1881. (Comp. Laws of 1885, p. 930.) On August 1, 1883, Boyd replevied the cattle from Rigg, and on the same day Rigg, as principal, and James Huffaker, W. W. Cook, and others, as sureties,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White-Crow v. White-WingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
- Snow v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Boyd v. HuffakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
3Cited by13 opinions
- Evans v. KloeppelSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
- Larimer v. KnoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Dierks v. WalshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- McAdow v. Kansas City Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Disney v. St. Louis Jewelry Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.