Legal Opinion

Stapleton v. Ponte

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 25, 2019No. 18-3227Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-3227 Stapleton v. Ponte UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Parker v. Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Matusick v. Erie County Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  4. Carpenters Pension Trust Fund of St. Louis v. PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  5. LaFleur v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API