Carlisle v. Pullman Palace Car Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to District Court of Pueblo County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, C. J.
This action was instituted in the district court of Pueblo county against the defendant in error, for the recovery of money alleged to be due the county on account of taxes assessed by the county authorities, against the defendant in error, upon certain sleeping cars used upon the passenger trains of the Denver & Eio Grande, and the Atchison, Topeka & Sante Pe railroads. The court below decided against the authority of the county to levy the taxes, and this writ of error is prosecuted in behalf of the county to test the correctness of the decision.
The cause has been submitted upon an agreed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hoyt v. . the Commissioners of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Pace v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Missouri River, Fort Scott & Gulf R. R. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Gillett v. Missouri Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Barlow v. Ordinary of Sumter CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Ames v. People ex rel. TempleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
- Martin v. Montezuma-Cortez School District Re-1Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People ex rel. Iron Silver Min. Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Board of County Commissioners v. LunneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.