Legal Opinion

Karpf v. Karpf

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1992No. S-89-729PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff-appellant Amanda M. Karpf and two of her minor children, William Charles Karpf and Chloe Marie Karpf, through her as their guardian and next friend, seek redress for the breach of the fiduciary duty owed them, as limited beneficiaries of the Henry S. Karpf Trusts, by the defendant-appellee, Charles T. Karpf, as trustee. The district court dismissed the limited beneficiaries’ petition, which also seeks damages from the trustee as an individual. They assign as operative errors, in summary, (1) the district court’s evidential rulings, and (2) its determination that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Ebke v. Board of Educational Lands & FundsNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Irwin S. Chanin v. The United States. Henry I. Chanin v. The United States. Sylvia Chanin v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. D. Clifford Crummey v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. French v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hitzemann v. AdamNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In re William R. Zutavern Revocable TrustNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Buchholz v. Cook (In Re Cook)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
  5. In re Estate of StuchlikNebraska Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API