Legal Opinion

Walker v. Sinclair Refining Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 2, 1971No. Civ. A. 39206PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

VANARTSDALEN, District Judge.

A seaman-plaintiff seeks damages for personal injuries sustained while employed by the defendant shipowner. Recovery is sought under maritime law for unseaworthiness and the Jones Act for negligence. The issue of liability was tried by the Court without a jury by agreement of counsel.

Although many of the facts are not in dispute, there is a serious dispute as to the actual happening of plaintiff’s fall giving rise to the injuries. Plaintiff’s version of the occurrence may be summarized as follows: —…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Jones v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  5. Nowery v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitney Allen v. Seacoast Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Smith v. American Mail Line, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API