Legal Opinion
Satterfield, Mayor v. Fewell
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 24, 1941No. 4-6255PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellee filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against appellant, as mayor of the city of Little Rock, which contained the following allegations. From June, 1930, to October 1, 1939, he was custodian of City Park. On June 12, 1937, as such custodian, he was placed under Civil 'Service, by virtue of act 322 of the Acts of the 1937 'Session of the General Assembly of this state. Appellant — respondent—is, and, on October 1, 1939, was, the mayor of the city of Little Rock.
It was further alleged that “About October 1, 1939, respondent, for economic reasons, suspended the: operation of certain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Latta v. MariannaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Ausburn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Hill v. RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- City of El Dorado v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Fiveash v. HoldernessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Purcell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Mears v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- City of Harrison v. SnyderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Better Way Life Ins. Co. v. Graves, Ins. Comm'rSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Ellis v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.