State v. Canda Cattle Car Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Bamsey county, Jaggard, J., sustaining a general demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action was brought to recover the sum of $480, together with penalties and interest, the amount of a tax assessed against the' property of defendant under and pursuant to the provisions of Laws 1897, c. 160, entitled “An act providing for the taxation of freight line and equipment companies.” Defendant interposed a general demurrer to the complaint, which was sustained by the court below, and plaintiff appealed.
The facts are as follows: Defendant is a corporation organized and created under the laws of the state of West Virginia, and comes within the definition of a “freight line…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Pensacola Telegraph Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- American Refrigerator Transit Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. United States Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- State v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Common School District No. 15 v. SagengSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- State v. Union Tank Line Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Naftalin v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.