Legal Opinion

Peaslee Gaulbert Paint & Varnish Co. v. Lumpkin

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1960No. 41467PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Peaslee Gaulbert Paint & Varnish Company sued A. L. and Kermit Lumpkin, on an open account, to recover $308.25. The Lumpkins, in their answer, admitted the purchase of the materials in question. However the issue, as developed by the pleadings, was whether or not the plaintiff, to whom the Lumpkins were indebted in the amount sued for, agreed with Quality Paint Company, which was indebted to the Lumpkins in a sum in excess *640of $308.25, to transfer the Lumpkin account to Quality-Paint Company and look only to it for payment.

The evidence for the Lumpkins was to this effect: They bought the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Greenwood Leflore Hospital Comm. v. TurnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Allen v. Smith BrandMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  3. American Blakeslee Mfg. Co. v. Martin & SonMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Harris v. GriffinMississippi Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Powell v. SowellMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Davis v. StegallMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Nassau Terrace Condominium Ass'n v. SilversteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. NASSAU TERRACE CONDO. ASS'N v. SilversteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API