Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Eikenberry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1903No. 20,127PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Howard Circuit Court; W. W. Mount, Judge. Suit by William H. Eikenberry against Walter J. Di-xon and others to quiet title. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal. Transferred from Appellate Court, under clause 2, §1337j Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

— Action by tbe appellee Eikenberry to quiet his title to a tract of land situated in Howard county. Answer in denial. Trial by court, and special finding with conclusions of law thereon. Exceptions by each defendant below to the second and third conclusions. Judgment for appellee.

Error is assigned on the second and third conclusions of law, which were as follows: “(S) That the plaintiff William H. Eikenberry has and holds a first lien upon the real estate described in his complaint, in the sum of $103.85, with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent, per annum from October 23, 1899, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grattan v. WigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  2. United States Saving Fund & Investment Co. v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Tallman v. ElyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Day v. BrentonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Adair v. MergentheimIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gorbach Properties, Inc. v. Reyes, No. 268402 (Apr. 4, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API