Legal Opinion
Metlife Auto & Home v. Burgos
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 17, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 75 to stay an uninsured motorist arbitration, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silverman, J.H.O.), entered December 18, 2002, which, in effect, denied the petition and determined, inter alia, that it was obligated to provide coverage under the uninsured motorist provision of its insurance policy.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, and the arbitration is stayed.
The petitioner, Metlife Auto & Home (hereinafter the appellant) provided an automobile insurance policy to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Thrasher v. United States Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ImeriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. BresilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Eveready Insurance v. MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Allstate Insurance v. GuillaumeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Continental Insurance v. BautzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Eagle Insurance v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.