SAIF Corp. v. Reid
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
SAIF seeks review of a final order on reconsideration from the Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS). DCBS held that SAIF was required to pay for psychological services that claimant received outside a certified managed care organization (MCO) during the time SAIF de facto denied the psychological condition claim. We review for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8)(a) and ORS 656.298(6), and affirm.
The facts are not disputed. Claimant sustained an injury in January 1992 when he fell approximately 40 feet. SAIF accepted various physical conditions in March 1992. SAIF knew, as early as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Johansen v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Altamirano v. Woodburn Nursery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. CornellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Orowheat-Bimbo Bakeries USA-BBU, Inc. v. VargasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Saif Corp. v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Travelers Indemnity of Illinois v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Valerio v. San Mateo Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017