Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Wilheit

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1987No. 8897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Judge.

Plaintiffs, the mother and sisters of David Dawson (decedent), brought this action seeking compensatory, as well as punitive, damages based on alleged negligent infliction of emotional distress. They appeal from an order dismissing their complaint for failure to state a claim. We affirm.

Since defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motions challenge the sufficiency of the statement of the claim for relief, not the facts that may support it, we accept as true all the facts that are pled. NMSA 1978, Civ.P. Rule 12(b)(6) (Repl.Pamp.1980); McCasland v. Prather, 92 N.M. 192, 585 P.2d 336…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. MaezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ramirez v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  3. McCasland v. PratherNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Infield v. CopeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Barela v. Frank A. Hubbell CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Madrid v. Lincoln County Medical CenterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Acosta v. Castle Construction, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API