Joe G. Garcia, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
Joe G. Garcia appeals the district court’s decision granting the motion of the San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (“SAMTA”) for summary judgment and denying his own. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
SAMTA is the governmental body that runs the public transit system in San Antonio, Texas. The plaintiffs (collectively, “Garcia”), employees of SAMTA, brought this action in 1979 for back pay and liquidated damages attributable to SAMTA’s violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). The historical context for the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Rodríguez Cruz v. Padilla AyalaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1990
- Robert Ackinclose, Joseph F. Barcia v. Palm Beach County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Knight v. MorrisDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1988
- San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Ann McLaughlin Secretary of Labor of the United States, Joe G. Garcia, Intervenor-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.