Legal Opinion

King v. Clark

New York Court of Chancery

Decided December 20, 1831PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was an application to dissolve an injunction, which had been obtained upon a bill of discovery to aid a defence at iaw, and also for the costs of the defendant in answering the • bill.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

An injunction granted upon a mere bill of discovery to aid a defence at law, is only intended to delay the trial until such discovery can be obtained. It is therefore a matter of course to dissolve the injunction as soon as the answer of the defendant is perfected, whether he admits or denies the facts charged in the bill. As the only object of this bill is to obtain the defendant's answer on oath, to be used on the trial at law, there can be no ground for restraining the party from proceeding at law after the discovery has been obtained.

As a general rule, the defendant who has…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henwood v. JarvisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1876
  2. Drake v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  3. Dennis v. RileySuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1850

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API