Blackwell v. Sawtell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. A conclusion of fact by a pleader which is not authorized by any inference from the facts alleged upon which the conclusion is based is insufficient as an allegation of the fact alleged in the conclusion. Southern Railway Company v. Covenia, 100 Ga. 46 (29 S. *562E. 219, 40 L. R. A. 253, 62 Am. St. R. 312); Blackstone v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co., 105 Ga. 380 (31 S. E. 90).
Decided September 20, 1934. Edgar Chambers Jr., for plaintiff. Ellis & Bell, for defendant.
2. A notice given by a tenant to the landlord that the “east end” of a porch which runs the length of two rooms across the house has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. CoveniaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Blackstone v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Hendrick v. MuseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- David D. Doniger & Co. v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940