Legal Opinion

Henschel v. Rural Mutual Casualty Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action for damages growing out of an automobile accident. Respondents bring a motion before this court for an order “requiring the defendant-appellants to print, serve, and file herein a proper brief and appendix of defendant-appellants, and for such other and further order as is just and equitable herein.”

In motions such as this the court does not have before it the brief and appendix of the appellants and cannot say whether or not they are proper or just how they do not comply with the rules, but must rely upon the allegations of the respondent. These allegations are usually…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seifert v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Withers v. TuckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Nothem v. BerenschotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Dunn v. Fred A. Mikkelson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Seifert v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API