Legal Opinion

Marston v. Brittenham

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1875PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of DeWitt county; the Hon. Thomas F. Tipton, Judge, presiding. This was a bill in chancery, by Sarah J. Brittenham against Jeremiah Marston, Daniel K. Tenney, John J. McClellan, John V. Farwell, Charles B. Farwell, Simon Farwell, Clifton H. Moore and Vespasian Warner. The facts of the case and object of the bill are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

The complainant below, and appellee here, asks that a certain deed of trust, purporting to have been executed by herself and her then husband, John A. Brittenham, on lands in DeWitt county, which were her separate property, be set aside, or that she be allowed to redeem from the sale had thereunder.

The deed of trust purports, on its face, to have been executed on the 10th day of March, 1870, by complainant and her husband to John J. McClellan, conveying the lands described therein, in trust, to secure the payment of a promissory note of that date for $2407.33, given by them to Far-well & Co.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Swift v. CastleIllinois Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Albany County Savings Bank v. McCartyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Regenold v. Baby Fold, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Atkinson v. Washington & Jefferson CollegeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Linton v. National Life Ins. Co. of VermontCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  5. Steffen v. BauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API