Shaw Mortgage Corp. v. Peerless Insurance
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Shaw Mortgage Corporation dba Patiosource & The Natural Touch (“Plaintiff’ or “Shaw Mortgage”) and Defendant Peerless Insurance Company (“Defendant” or “Peerless”) have filed cross-motions for partial summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s motion is DENIED and Plaintiffs motion is DENIED.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Since 1995, Steve and Jan Shaw (the “Shaws”) have operated the Natural Touch and Patio Source as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- La Jolla Beach & Tennis Club, Inc. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Palmer v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- R & B Auto Center, Inc. v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Milk Indus. Mgmt. Corp. v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Am.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Best Rest Motel, Inc. v. Sequoia Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Inland Fresh Seafood Corporation of America, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025