Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Callison v. Callison

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 13, 1984No. 55890Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partOpala, Justice

Our review on certiorari addresses a disputed paternity suit. The Court of Appeals left undisturbed the trial court’s decree against the putative father (defendant), and this court’s opinion affirms that decision upon different grounds. It holds that (1) parentage, custody and support of an out-of-wedlock child may be litigated dehors the purview of a public paternity proceeding, 10 O.S.1981 §§ 71 et seq.,1 in a private *113action brought under the provisions of 12 O.S.1981 § 1277.2;2 (2) the three-year statute of limitations, 10 O.S.1981 § 83,3 determined to govern all paternity contests between…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API