Legal Opinion

Burrow v. Miller

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves the right of ingress and egress by the appellees Bruce and Wendell Miller and Lura Howell, over the appellants', Swansie and Maggie Burrow's, property. The trial Court, hearing the evidence ore tenus, granted to the appellees the right of ingress and egress over the Burrow's property and enjoined the Burrows from interfering with the appellees' rights. We affirm.

The opposing parties are coterminous landowners. Their common source of title is J.C. Clark. The Howell's land is located south of the Burrows.

The Howell's right of ingress and egress was a road separating the lands…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Camp v. MilamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Hamby v. StepletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Leeth v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bull v. SalsmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Henderson v. DunnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Cleek v. PoviaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Gowan v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Hanks v. SpannCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API