Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Defino

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 20, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

Deceased’s will named his daughter as executrix. She offered his will for probate and while the proceeding was pending died. Her husband has been named her administrator. The will of deceased has been admitted to probate. The eighth clause of the will gives the residuary in equal shares to the daughter who was named as executrix and to a person described as deceased’s “ common-law wife, Edith Betts ”.

The last-named petitions. for letters of administration with the will annexed. She asserts a status as surviving spouse. An answer to that petition was interposed by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of HubbsNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. In re the Estate of BaumesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of ThompsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of FolsomNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of HoppinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  3. In re the Estate of NeeleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
  4. In re the Estate of AustinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API