Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Barone v. Fox

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Hearing upon return to writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

Hpon the theory of discrimination between men and women, the attack upon the constitutionality of this statute (Laws of 1910, chap. 059, § 79) is not well fotmded. It is unquestionably an enactment having for its aim the safeguarding of the health of the inhabitants of the State, and the matter is fully within the police power. Ground of argument is not lacking that the danger from the spread of disease by women of the class in question is greater than the danger existing from the disease in the *401case of men, and that the present regulation is necessitated a's a step distinct in its nature…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Farrington v. . MenschingNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. In re KennyNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People ex rel. Abrams v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Barone v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API