Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Whiddon

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1942No. 14155PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. Where in a suit against several defendants an attorney-filed an answer and general and special demurrers, signing the same as “Defendants’ Attorney,” it will be presumed, nothing to the contrary appearing, that the attorney was in fact authorized to represent all of such defendants, and to file such pleadings in their behalf. Code, § 9-604; Edwards v. Wall, 153 Ga. 776 (4) (113 S. E. 190). Howell v. Howell, 188 Ga. 803 (4 S. E. 2d, 835).

2. Where an administrator filed a suit against the widow and five named children of his intestate, two of the children being minors, to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Crawford v. VernerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Hancock v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Lasseter v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Barber v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  3. Michel v. AbrahamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. LR SAMS COMPANY, INC. v. HardySupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  5. Turner v. HeltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API