Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Riddle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1914No. 22,137Published

Prom Probate Court of Marion. County (9,021); Frcmlc B. Boss, Judge. Action by John Q. Riddle, assignee of the Baackes Wire Nail Company, against Collie E. Kinney,- administrator of the estate of Jacob S. Hildebrand, deceased. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the lower court allowing and ordering paid a claim for $9,305.80 against the estate which appellant was administering in that court. Omitting the caption and subscription and jurat, the claim was stated as follows: “John Q. Riddle, being duly sworn, says on his oath that he was duly appointed and qualified as assignee of the Baackes Wire Nail Company of the city of Cleveland, county of Cuyahoga, state of Ohio, on the fourteenth (14) day of June, eighteen hundred and ninety-three, (1893), that, he has acted as such assignee and is still acting as such under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fewlass v. KeeshanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  2. Stanford v. . LockwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API