Williams v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Alabama
Error from Madison Circuit Court. In this case, Thomas B. Murphy filed his bill for review and injunction, against John Williams; alleging that sundry matters in controversy between these parties, had been referred, with the proceedings on a former bill, filed by him, Murphy, to arbitration ; that an award was rendered, and by agreement, made the decree of the court, that Murphy should pay . to Williams the sum of eight hundred dollars ; and that Williams should place in the…
Read the full summary
Error from Madison Circuit Court. In this case, Thomas B. Murphy filed his bill for review and injunction, against John Williams; alleging that sundry matters in controversy between these parties, had been referred, with the proceedings on a former bill, filed by him, Murphy, to arbitration ; that an award was rendered, and by agreement, made the decree of the court, that Murphy should pay . to Williams the sum of eight hundred dollars ; and that Williams should place in the hands of a person designated for that purpose, certain notes and accounts due to the firm, to be collected for their…
1Opinion of the Court
By Mr. Justice Saffold :
This cause having been' submitted, without argument, on voluminous documents, few of which are entitled to influence in the decision, such only will be noticed as are considered material to the present determination.
This bill having been filed by Murphy, alleges, among other things, that the matters in controversy, which related to the settlement of the partnership transactions between these parties in Kentucky, so far as the facts were then known, were referred, with all the proceedings, on a former bill filed by him, to arbitrationt — hat this was under an agreement…
2Cited by2 opinions
- McDougald's Adm'r v. DoughertySupreme Court of Alabama · 1864
- Sims v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841