Prus v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Grigoriy Ivanovich Prus, a citizen of Uzbekistan, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal. We grant Prus’s petition and remand.
Because the IJ found that Prus suffered past persecution in Uzbekistan on account of religion, he was entitled to a presumption that he had a well-founded fear of future persecution. 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(b)(1); Korablina v. INS, 158 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.1998). To rebut this presumption, the government may show there has been “a fundamental change in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Teresita Moral BORJA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Vera KORABLINA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Cesar M. Lopez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Nune Mamouzian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. BarrDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019