Legal Opinion · Dissent

Borquez v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 10, 1985No. 83-2418Published

1DissentFletcher, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The Association and the Forest Service shared responsibility for managing the Roosevelt Power Canal Diversion Dam, where the drowning incident occurred. The Association was responsible for operating the dam for irrigation and power generation purposes, while the Forest Service administered the area around and including the dam as a recreational area within Tonto National Forest. I conclude that because of the Forest Service’s management activities, the United States had a duty to warn recreational visitors to the dam area concerning the potential dangers associated with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. MacNeil v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Fendler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Heth v. Del Webb's Highway InnArizona Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API