Legal Opinion
AUSTIN v. MAINELY CONSTRUCTION RENTALS LLC
District Court, D. Maine
Decided February 23, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00182Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE RICHARD AUSTIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Docket No. 2:20-cv-00182-NT ) MAINELY CONSTRUCTION ) RENTALS, LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The Plaintiff, Richard Austin, claims that his former employer unlawfully discriminated against him because of his disability. Because there are genuine factual disputes about (1) the essential functions of Austin’s job, and (2) whether he can perform those essential functions with or without an accommodation, the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Calero-Cerezo v. U.S. Dep of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Gillen v. Fallon Ambulance Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.