Legal Opinion

Ex parte Hertz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1953No. 4928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT.

This is an application for leave to appeal, in the case of State of Ohio v. Carl C. Hertz, No. 92781, Franklin County, Ohio, more than thirty days after sentence and judgment. Such an appeal is permissible under §13459-4 GC “only by leave of Court or two of the Judges thereof ” This Court recently held in State v. McGahan, 86 Oh Ap 283, that leave to appeal would not be granted without a showing of good cause. See also, In re Martin, 61 Abs 309, 104 N. E. (2d) 194. The only ground set forth by this petitioner is that he learned that his sentence was illegal, after he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gireak v. Industrial CommissionTrumbull County Court of Common Pleas · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CardwellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1972
  2. State v. ForsytheOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API