Legal Opinion
MATTER OF CASE v. State Ins. Fund
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 1988PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The requirements for the cancellation of workers’ compensation insurance coverage must be strictly observed (Matter of Conklin v Byram House Rest., 32 AD2d 582, 583, affd 30 NY2d 657; Workers’ Compensation Law § 54 [5]). On the other hand, failure to establish strict compliance in the cancellation of a policy does not result in the automatic renewal of the policy in perpetuity, when the record discloses a course of conduct and intent by both the insured and the carrier not to renew subsequent to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Conklin v. Byram House Restaurant, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Claim of Leide v. Jacy Painting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Matter of Conklin v. Byram House Rest., Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Claim of Barnes v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Claim of Pucci v. Novel Lithographers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
3Cited by12 opinions
- Claim of Cruz v. New Millennium Construction & Restoration Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Russell v. Linens Plus, The Linen Mill Outlet, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Matter of Craig v. Leatherstocking Healthcare, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of Osorio v. M & L Express, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Mendez v. TGA Constr., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.