Legal Opinion

Ratcliffe v. Dakan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from, District Oowrt of Douglas County.

1Opinion of the Court

Richmond, O.

This was an action for an injunction to enforce certain rights to water for irrigation in water-district Ho. 8, Douglas county, Colorado.

*101The plaintiffs (appellants) claimed certain water-rights in respect to four ditches, setting forth the ownership by defendants of two ditches, and alleging the commission by defendants of various wrongful acts in violation of plaint- ! iffs’ prior rights to water. Prayer for injunction, and for general relief, and for costs.

By the answer various defenses are set up which we deem it unnecessary to recite in the statement of the case.

The question…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Portz v. SchantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Brown v. HendersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1821

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mountain Water Works Construction Co. v. HolmeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. Keener v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Putnam v. LyonColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Putnam v. LyonColorado Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API