Legal Opinion

Lumpkin v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided February 6, 2004No. 01-02-00782-CRPublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIM TAFT, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Leroy Lumpkin, guilty of possession of cocaine, in an amount more than one gram but less than four grams, and of tampering with evidence. Having found true enhancement allegations of prior convictions for possession and delivery of a controlled substance, the jury assessed punishment for each offense at 37 years in prison. We address whether the evidence supporting the tampering-with-evidence conviction is legally insufficient to prove that appellant knew that an investigation concerning cocaine was in progress when he ingested cocaine. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Jagaroo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. State of Tennessee v. Glover P. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Rayme v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  5. Karl Dean Stahmann v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2018

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API