Legal Opinion

Turner v. Houpt

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On bill, amended bill, and bill of review and answers.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

The object of the bill is to set aside an exchange of real properties made between Albert L. Turner, the original complainant, and the defendants on the last days of May, 1891.

By deed dated May 29th, 1891, Dr. Turner and his wife, the new complainant, Lillian M. Turner, conveyed to Henry J. Houpt a hotel called the Norwood inn, and some vacant building lots at Avon-by-the-Sea, Monmouth county • and by deed of the same date the defendants conveyed to Mrs. Turner a farm and woollen-mill property in Maryland, called the Mallalieu mill, the one conveyance being the consideration for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murray v. BallouNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  2. Miller v. SherrySupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Murray v. LylburnNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  4. Stevens v. VancleveU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1822
  5. Wortham v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Manzo v. Shawmut Bank, NANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  2. Jennifer Keri Stahlberger - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  3. Wright v. Trystone Capital Assets, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API