Legal Opinion

People v. Ornelas

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1936No. Crim. 336PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendant was charged with the crime of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, alleged to have been committed by striking one M. A. Patterson about the head and body with an iron bar. The jury found him guilty and he appeals from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The ease arose out of acts occurring in an orange grove in Orange County at a time when a strike was in progress. Patterson testified that he was in charge of the packing house for an orange association; that on the day in question he was acting as a guard…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. People v. ScoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. People v. SigalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API