Legal Opinion
Dundes v. Fuersich
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bernard J. Fried, J.
Defendants move, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that it fails to state a cause of action based upon a joint venture against any of the defendants *883and, alternatively, that no claim is stated against the two individual defendants, Lawrence Fuersich and Henry Burr.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff, Seena Dundes, is the legal representative of the estate of Lester Dundes. Lester Dundes was a renowned and highly respected figure in the interior design industry, having been the publisher for many years of Interior…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- 511 West 232nd Owners Corp. v. Jennifer Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Sokoloff v. Harriman Estates Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Richbell Information Services, Inc. v. Jupiter Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Steinbeck v. GerosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Penato v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cosy Goose Hellas v. Cosy Goose USA. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008