Legal Opinion

H Eighth Avenue Associates, LLC v. Stessa Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 23, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

*593Plaintiff seller could not have cured the notice of pendency problem by the latest of the closing dates selected through no fault of its own, and properly demanded that defendant purchaser elect its remedies pursuant to the limitation of remedies provision in their contract of sale (see Mehlman v 592-600 Union Ave. Corp., 46 AD3d 338, 342-343 [2007]; Meisels v 1295 Union Equities Corp., 306 AD2d 144, 145 [2003]). The seller properly terminated the contract in light of the purchaser’s failure to make the election and demonstrate its financial ability to close (see Gindi v Intertrade…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BeriguetteNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Gindi v. Intertrade Internationale Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Mehlman v. 592-600 Union Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Meisels v. 1295 Union Equities Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Sisler v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API