Legal Opinion
Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co. v. GHD Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 5, 2018No. Case No. 16–C–1619Published
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam C. Griesbach, Chief Judge
Plaintiff Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company brought this diversity *920action for declaratory relief against Defendant GHD Inc., now known as DVO Inc., seeking a determination that Crum & Forster has no duty to defend DVO under the Errors and Omissions (E & O) coverage of the primary and excess insurance policies (collectively, the Policy) it issued to DVO in an underlying lawsuit. Crum & Forster is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New Jersey. ECF No. 2 at 1; 19-4 at 1. DVO is a Wisconsin corporation with its principal place of business in Chilton,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Siegel v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Robert Foley and Patricia Foley v. City of Lafayette, Indiana, and Fred TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Timothy Parent v. Home Depot U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- A. E. Investment Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.