Legal Opinion · Dissent

Larry F. Mitchell v. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 25, 2017No. 2016-C -1097Published

1DissentCrichton, J.

_JiThis Court granted the writ, received briefing from the parties, and heard oral arguments; but now a majority of the *1062Court has voted to recall our order as “improvidently granted.” I dissent. “At this juncture the case should be decided on its merits.” McGrail v. Lee, 2002-1496, p. 1 (La. 4/9/03), 874 So.2d 66 (Calogero, C.J., dissenting from a writ recall).1 In its place is a recall that reflects poorly on our effort to “ensure adequate consideration of each case and make decisions,based on legally relevant factors, thereby affording every litigant the full benefit of the judicial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. StuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. Yarnell Ice Cream Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  3. Jeremy George, Et Ux. v. Robbie Dugas, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2016
  4. Mitchell v. State, Department of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. McGrail v. LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API