Greenberg v. Wrynn

The denial of petitioner’s applications is supported by substantial evidence. The certificate of good conduct he received from the Division of Parole does not establish prima facie his entitlement to a license, but merely creates a presumption of rehabilitation. Moreover, the certificate is only one of eight factors to be considered pursuant to Correction Law § 753, and we find that respondent considered and properly balanced all the factors (see Matter of Arrocha v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 93 NY2d 361, 365 [1999]; Matter of Bonacorsa v Van Lindt, 71 NY2d 605 [1988]).

In petitioner’s…