Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentSaunders, Judge
hi feel that we should reverse the trial court. It is well established that La.Code Civ.P. art. 561 is to be liberally construed in favor of maintaining a plaintiffs suit. Rosier v. Benoit, 09-1557 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/5/10), 37 So.3d 1093. Here, I feel that the majority opinion is taking an approach that is too rigid with regard to the DOTD’s discovery responses, and that OHH’s letter can be construed as a “step” under La. Code Civ.P. art. 561.
The purpose behind La.Civ.Code art. 561 is to prevent the lingering of suits for a protracted time so as to vex or harass a defendant, not to dismiss…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- American Home Building Co. v. SlateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Brown v. Sutherland Lumber, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. Bayou Fleet, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Rosier v. BenoitLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010