Legal Opinion · Dissent

Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 2011No. 10-1392Published

1DissentSaunders, Judge

hi feel that we should reverse the trial court. It is well established that La.Code Civ.P. art. 561 is to be liberally construed in favor of maintaining a plaintiffs suit. Rosier v. Benoit, 09-1557 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/5/10), 37 So.3d 1093. Here, I feel that the majority opinion is taking an approach that is too rigid with regard to the DOTD’s discovery responses, and that OHH’s letter can be construed as a “step” under La. Code Civ.P. art. 561.

The purpose behind La.Civ.Code art. 561 is to prevent the lingering of suits for a protracted time so as to vex or harass a defendant, not to dismiss…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. American Home Building Co. v. SlateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Brown v. Sutherland Lumber, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. Bayou Fleet, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Rosier v. BenoitLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API