Legal Opinion

Daniel Gonzales Dupree, Consul of Mexico, Applicant for Intervention, Antonio Garcia Orozco v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 25, 1977No. 75-1830PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

I

FACTS.

This present appeal derives from a suit filed on January 31, 1973 brought by three Mexican nationals in which they alleged that they were alien material witnesses who were being held in prison and being paid only $1 per day for each day of their detention, including days spent in court. They claimed that they and the putative class of others similarly situated were entitled to $20 per day for each day of court attendance; they sought a mandatory injunction compelling the United States to pay that sum as provided in § 28 U.S.C. § 1821 and to reimburse plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cordes & Co. Financial Services v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,010 Fred H. Harmsen v. C. Arnholt SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. Gerritsen v. De La Madrid HurtadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API