Legal Opinion

Bachman v. Roller

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1877Published

EROM "WASHINGTON. Appeal from the Circuit Court. J. A. McKinney, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSneed, J.

The action was upon a promissory note, executed 31st of January, 1860, by the defendant to the plaintiff, and due at one day, for two thousand seven hundred and ninety-one dollars and seventy-three cents, payable in “ par bank notes.” Underneath the note was written a memorandum by the holder in these words and without signature, “Samuel Bachman is bound in writing to pay the above in gold and silver. See obligation.”

The suit was instituted on the 1st of April, 1872, *410and two verdicts bave been had for the plaintiff. Among the pleas originally filed were those of a tender and the statute of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. M'Crea v. PurmortCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  2. Evans v. CareySupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  3. Vaughn v. ElyNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Jordan's Adm'r v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  5. Minkler v. Estate of MinklerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1844

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API